Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Franciscus

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1998No. 20 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this case to address the issue of whether Chad Franciscus’s right to assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and under Article I, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution was violated by the admission at trial of incriminating statements made by him to a jailhouse informant. For the following reasons, we find that the admission of the statements violated Franciscus’s right to assistance of counsel guaranteed by the federal and state constitutions and that a new trial is required.

On September 30, 1991,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. LopezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. OgrodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API