Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1965No. 5570PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This case being related to consolidated Cases Nos. 5474, 5475, 5476 and 5477, D.C., 248 F.Supp. 99, previously tried by the Court attorneys for both sides agreed that the evidence received in such consolidated cases pertaining to the operation of the dam and reservoir by the defendant and the activities of the three decedents in said cases and the plaintiff therein, Mary Lou Richardson, including all rescue efforts, may be considered as being received as evidence herein for all pertinent purposes.

The plaintiff herein was fishing from the east bank of the river below…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Champlin Hardware Co. v. ClevingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Oklahoma Power & Water Co. v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Merritt v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Day v. Waffle House, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API