Legal Opinion

Graziani v. Epic Data Corp.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 25, 2004No. 02-K-1284Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KANE, Senior District Judge.

This tort action brought by a former management level employee against his employer and the United Parcel Service Corporation (“UPS”) is before me on UPS’s motion for summary judgment. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. UPS seeks summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. of Civ. P. 56, on both of Plaintiffs asserted claims. Plaintiff Larry Gra-ziani asserts two claims against UPS: one for intentional interference with a contractual relationship and the other, defamation. The action arose after Graziani’s employer, Epic Data…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API