Graziani v. Epic Data Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This tort action brought by a former management level employee against his employer and the United Parcel Service Corporation (“UPS”) is before me on UPS’s motion for summary judgment. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. UPS seeks summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. of Civ. P. 56, on both of Plaintiffs asserted claims. Plaintiff Larry Gra-ziani asserts two claims against UPS: one for intentional interference with a contractual relationship and the other, defamation. The action arose after Graziani’s employer, Epic Data…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.