Legal Opinion

Pearmain v. Massachusetts Hospital Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 7, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.

The plaintiff held a second, and the defendant insurance company, hereinafter called the defendant, a first mortgage upon certain real estate. The taxes upon the premises for 1904 were overdue and unpaid and the collector of taxes had advertised them for sale therefor in September, 1906, when the defendant gave notice to the plaintiff that, if they were not paid, it would foreclose its mortgage. It has been found as a fact that “ in consequence of the situation disclosed by this notice the plaintiff, as second mortgagee, paid the taxes,” receiving from the tax collector the certificate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. BulteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Attorney General v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Doyle v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Hammond v. LovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Joyner v. Lenox Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Buskirk v. State-Planters Bank & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wiggin v. Lowell Five Cent Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API