Legal Opinion

Quisenberry v. Chenault

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wolfe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*313Opinion op the Coubt by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

This is the fifth appeal of this case. In the opinion on the last appeal, Quisenberry v. Chenault, 30 Ky. Law Rep., 229; 97 S. W., 803, this court said:

“If, upon a retrial of the case, the evidence is in substance the same as that introduced on the last trial, the court should give a peremptory, instruction to find for the defendants.”

The court deeming the evidence heard on the last trial to be the same, in effect, as that introduced on the former, compiled with the order of this court and gave the peremptory instruction. This court is bound by its…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tennis Coal Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Camp v. RiddleTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bush v. Chenault'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MinkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API