Legal Opinion

Bornstein v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit arises out of the execution and levy and ex parte injunctions in supplementary proceedings against plaintiff, a judgment debtor, which were vacated in Shire v. Bornstein (6 Misc 2d 764, affd. 4 A D 2d 74, affd. 4 N Y 2d 299). In the first cause of action, defendant — an attorney under whose direction the void execution and levy were procured — is sued for the damages incurred in vacating them. The second cause *364is for the expenses attendant upon procuring the vacatur of the supplementary proceedings. We sustained the complaint herein as a pleading in Bornstein v. Silverman (7 A D 2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. . MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Vernes v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Shire v. BornsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Silberstein v. Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Racoosin v. Le Schack & Grodensky, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Silberstein v. Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. ERA Realty Co. v. RBS PropertiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Gaines v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API