Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Young

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1884No. 10,870PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— This action was brought by the appellee to recover the statutory penalty for the failure of the appellant to transmit and deliver a message.

It is said that the complaint is bad because it does not aver that the penalty is unpaid, but we deem this position untenable. The purpose of such an allegation in an action on a contract is to show a breach by non-payment, but in actions on torts or for penalties there is no necessity for showing a failure to pay the damages or the penalty.

Complaint is made of the ruling on demurrer to the third paragraph of the answer. The general theory of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Platter v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Leeds v. City of RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API