Legal Opinion

Fishburn v. Pierce County Planning & Land Services Department

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 26, 2011No. 40429-0-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

¶1 — Daniel and Lori Fishburn1 appeal the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) and the Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department (PALS) and denying the Fishburns’ reconsideration motion, claiming that exceptions to the public duty doctrine created duties owed specifically to them by TPCHD and PALS. The Fishburns argue that the public duty doctrine’s exceptions impose a duty on TPCHD and PALS arising from the faulty site preparation, installation, and inspection of their home’s *457septic system during its construction in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary Alexander And Diane Alexander, Apps. v. Capital One, N.a., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Hugh And Martha Sisley, App v. City Of Seattle, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Kyla Estes v. Jonathon LavoiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API