Legal Opinion

Hugh And Martha Sisley, App v. City Of Seattle, Resp

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 3, 2014No. 69827-3Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON HUGH K. SISLEY and MARTHA E. ) NOS. 69827-3-1 SISLEY, both individually and on behalf ) 69828-1-1 of their marital community, (Consolidated Cases) Appellants, DIVISION ONE v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal UNPUBLISHED OPINION corporation, Respondent. FILED: February 3, 2014 .) 3 -~ CD cz;-; I ~n^' Lau, J. —In this multi-decade long dispute over the City ofSeattle's housing jS^i•.! code enforcement actions involving numerous residential rental properties ownecPby 31, Hugh and Martha Sisley, the Sisleys appeal the trial court's partial summary…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API