Legal Opinion
Jonathan Fuller v. Ernie Roe, Warden State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1999No. 97-16254PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Per curiam
Jonathan Fuller, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s 3 denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court determined that there was no merit to the multitude of claims presented by Fuller. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and reviews de novo a district court’s denial of a writ of habeas corpus. See Park v. California, 164 F.3d 1226, 1229 (9th Cir.1999). On appeal, Fuller asserts various errors based on factual, procedural, and constitutional grounds. We affirm.
I
On December 17, 1992, Fuller was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Bruce Wayne Morris v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Tommy Martin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.