Legal Opinion

Russo v. Barger

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 26, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 14-0588PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge:

¶ 1 Michael Russo appeals the dismissal of his civil claims against Steven Barger, Carol Barger, Alan Mishkin, and Carol Mishkin (collectively, “Appellees”) based on a forum selection clause that designates Mexico as the appropriate venue for litigation. Because we conclude that Appellees waived reliance on the forum selection clause by actively participating in the state court litigation for more than three years before moving to dismiss on that basis, we vacate the superior court’s judgment and remand for further appropriate proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Societe Jean Nicolas Et Fils v. MousseuxArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Phoenix v. FieldsArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bolo Corporation v. Homes & Son Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Compass Bank v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Dominguez v. DominguezArizona Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Frink v. River Source Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. La Borgata v. RetreatCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API