Legal Opinion · Dissent

SERVICE PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Donahue

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1955No. 35686Published

1DissentHalley, Justice

I am forced to dissent in this case. In the first place the trial court erred in not sustaining a demurrer to the evidence because there is no evidence that the defendant was guilty of any negligence which *852caused the death of the deceased, Wilbur Lee Pratt. The only duty Pratt had to perform outside the building was to raise the flag each morning. He was never instructed to make repairs' on the flag pole. No fair minded person would ever say that there was anything dangerous about this roof and flag pole to a person whose only duty was to raise the flag. For the thing he was to do, Wilbur…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Torgerson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. National Valve & Mfg. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Ahern v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  4. HUNTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Hanson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API