Legal Opinion
HUNTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Watson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 14, 1953No. 34462PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NEAL, Justice.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, that is, Saletha Watson, as plaintiff, and The Hunter Construction Company, a corporation, as defendant.
Saletha Watson, the widow of A. R. Watson, sued to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of the deceased. The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the trial court. The defendant appeals contending that the verdict and judgment rendered is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law.
A resume of the record discloses that defendant was engaged in the construction of roads and highways; that in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Sanders v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hanson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Kurn v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henry v. Merck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Henry v. Merck and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Bready v. TiptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Bready v. TiptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Brodsky v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.