Done Holding Co. v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a condemnation proceeding, the State of New York appeals from a judgment of *810the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated August 31, 1989, which granted the claimants an additional allowance in the amount of $163,800 pursuant to EDPL 701.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The trial court properly exercised its discretion in awarding the claimant an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701. The State initially offered $52,300 for the property in question. At the trial, however, the State offered proof that the appropriated site had a value of $204,000. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the New York Transit AuhorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gordon v. Town of EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Town of Esopus v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Done Holding Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Bank & Trust Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Malin v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- County of Suffolk v. JohnathanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993