Legal Opinion

Henline v. Tri-State Promotions, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1962No. 19,564Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Kelley, J.

The appellees Holiday on Ice and Alvin R. Grant have filed separate unverified petitions for a rehearing. However, for purposes of consideration, we will treat them as one petition.

It is asserted that we erred in holding that “Appellant’s Brief” sets forth an appealable judgment. We fail to find that we made any such holding. Such question was not before us. It was not presented to us in any fashion or form. No motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment was filed by any of the appellees. No statement by any of the parties was made in the argument…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Henline v. Tri-State Promotions, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Warren v. Tam's Drugs, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API