Legal Opinion

Budding v. Garland Floor Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1996No. 68546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

Appellant, Raymond Budding, appeals the granting of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in favor of Garland Floor Company, Inc. (Garland), in a products liability action for failure to warn, and a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Garland and Park-Mark, Inc., on a negligence claim.

On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in: 1) granting Garland’s motion for JNOV because Garland had a legal duty to warn him of the dangerous effects of its product; 2) excluding the testimony of Ralph Hemphill because his testimony was relevant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Clifford Griggs v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Morris v. Shell Oil CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. D.K.L. v. H.P.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hunt v. Laclede Gas CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Govreau v. Nu-Way Concrete Forms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Feiteira v. Clark Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API