Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goodman v. Sioux Steel Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1991No. 17091Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

In every argument, one or more premisses and a conclusion are asserted. It is fundamental, in establishing sound law or a decision, that an argument must be first recognized. My brothers fail to recognize appellant’s argument.

Salient facts of this case are not revealed to the reader in the majority decision. Hence, deduction of legal propriety of this decision is not possible. Ultimate facts are set forth only and they are quite concluso-ry; they are set forth in four sentences, at the conclusion of this opinion, in the penultimate paragraph.

Whether our argument concerns public affairs or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. M.J. Daly Co. v. VarneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. L. & S. Construction Co. v. State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API