Legal Opinion

Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Miami Chocolates, LLC

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 21, 2018No. CASE NO.: 17-CV-23626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL C. HUCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Cause is before the Court upon Plaintiff Starr Indemnity & Liability Company's ("Starr") Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 42], and Defendant Peterbrooke Franchising of America, LLC's ("Peterbrooke"), counter Motion for Summary Judgment. [D.E. 64], which Miami Chocolates, LLC, Charles McDonald, and Judy McDonald's (the "MC Defendants") joined [D.E. 67].

I. Overview

Starr, an insurance company, has filed this declaratory action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, et seq. , requesting that this Court declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the MC…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelaher, Connell & Conner P.C. v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API