Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1994No. 64837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Wife appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the dissolution decree incorporating the parties’ separation agreement and for a new trial, alleging: (1) the agreement was unconscionable because Hus*395band misled her and the court as to the value of his pension plan and 401K plan, (2) the agreement was based on a mutual mistake as to the value of the pension plan and 401K plan, (3) Wife did not freely and voluntarily agree to the terms of the agreement, and (4) the agreement was not in the best interest of the parties’ minor child. We affirm.

Husband and Wife were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Matter of Estate of HysingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Alexander v. SagehornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Dow v. DowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Ludlow v. AhrensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ErkmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Whiteside v. RottgerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Prevato v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API