Legal Opinion

Lee v. Lewis

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1927No. 977-4809PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The opinion of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals is reported in 287 S. W. 115. The ease is here on one assignment of error, and that reads as follows:

“The Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that ‘appellants do not claim, either by pleading or proof, that they at any time during the extension period paid or offered to pay any annual interest’ because plaintiffs in error alleged that they agreed to pay interest during the extension period (transcript, p. 9), and the proof was, ‘We understand that, under our agreement for an extension of this note, we are to pay 8 per cent, interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Aycock v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Link v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Ellis v. Le BowTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Lee v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Amarillo Transfer & Storage Co. v. De ShongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Bauer v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Rogers v. Public Service Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API