Legal Opinion
Bey v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 15, 2019No. 19-10Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
In the Um'ted States Court ot Federal Claims NQ. 19~10€ (Fiied; April 15, 2019) NoT FoR PUBLICATIoN AAKIL BEY, Pro Se; Lack of Su’oject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC lZ(b)(l); 6th Amendnient; 14th Amendment; State Court Judgment; Torts. Pro Se Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. \*/\_/\_/\¢_/\_/\_/\\_/\_/\./\.,/\_/ ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff Aal<il Bey, proceeding pro se, filed the instant complaint on Decernber 26, 20l 8 alleging that Judge Raquel West, a state court judge in Beaumont, Texas violated his constitutional rights While presiding over his prosecution in 2018. Compl. at 2-3;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.