Legal Opinion

Henricksen v. Henricksen

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 10, 1980No. 78-C-208PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The plaintiff Wendee Henricksen seeks to recover in this action the approximate sum of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars from her former husband, George Henricksen, and his former employer, Smith, Barney, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc. (Smith Barney). The complaint states eight claims and alternative claims for relief, based on provisions of the federal securities laws, state common law, and certain rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the National Association of Securities Dealers. A two day bench trial was held in early January 1980,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Altschul v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Smith v. Chicago Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. Crummere v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. In Re OlpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Charles ZandfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API