Legal Opinion

State v. Berger

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1924No. 26571PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The appellant was convicted of carnal knowledge, under Act 192 of 1,912, p. 380.

The transcript contains four bills of exception, which are frivolous on their face and are not mentioned in appellant’s brief. They require no further notice.

In this court appellant files an assignment of error, under which he urges that the indictment found against him is fatally defective, in that, although the statute makes the offense a felony, yet the indictment fails to' charge that the offense was committed feloniously, or “with felonious intent.”

But the indictment charges the offense in the words of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. StaatsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. State v. GulizoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. State v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. State v. DierlammSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API