State v. Fontenot
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
BARHAM, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence under an amended bill of information charging obscenity as a felony, under R.S. 14:106(A) (1) and (C). 1 More than 20 bills of exception were perfected in the case, and several of these present interesting legal propositions which may have merit. We pretermit a discussion of all the bills of exception, however, for the bill of information is fatally defective on its face for failure to charge a crime under Louisiana law, and we take note of this ex propria motu, as we must. C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2); State v. Croal, 198 La. 820, 5…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- State v. GuillotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- State v. StraughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- State v. ChristineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. ElzieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- State v. ButtnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- State v. RupleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.