Good v. Martin
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Oourt, Arapahoe Qounty. Assumpsit on a promissory note by Ida Martin against Parker B. Cbeney, Wm. IsT. Shephard and Jno. Good. G.ood pleaded the general issue, upon which there was a trial and verdict for plaintiff, which was set aside by the court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Oourt, Arapahoe Qounty. Assumpsit on a promissory note by Ida Martin against Parker B. Cbeney, Wm. IsT. Shephard and Jno. Good. G.ood pleaded the general issue, upon which there was a trial and verdict for plaintiff, which was set aside by the court. Afterward the court allowed the plaintiff to amend the precipe writ and narr., by increasing the amount of damages, and thereupon Good- asked leave to plead to the declaration as amended, which was refused by the court. By leave of the court, Good’s attorney then withdrew his appearance, and the court proceeded to try the…
1Opinion of the CourtHallett, C. J.
We do not think it necessary to discuss at very great length the numerous questions of practice presented in this record. The motion to suppress the deposition of Atkins was founded upon objections to some of the answers to cross-interrogatories, and was therefore too broad. While the court below might, have considered the exceptions to the answers named, we do not see that *408there was error in refusing to suppress the entire deposition. The amendment of the ad damnum in the declaration, for which leave was obtained, does not appear to have been made, and perhaps we could with propriety pass…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crabtree v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Brown v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Coffin v. Evansville & Crawfordsville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westesen v. Olathe State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- King v. MilnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911