Legal Opinion

United States v. Amburgey

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 1, 1960No. Crim. A. 146-60PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

This case, which presents several important questions in the administration of the Durham 1 rule and the defense of insanity in District of Columbia criminal prosecutions, 2 is before the Court in the form of an alternative motion by the defendant, Calvin T. Amburgey, for judgment of acquittal by reason of insanity, 3 or for a new trial. 4 At the conclusion of the trial, the Court, which heard the case without a jury, found the defendant guilty of forging and uttering four checks, 5 and rejected the defense of insanity.

Before discussing the legal issues posed by this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Roosevelt Rollerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. William BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. William BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API