United States v. Amburgey
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
This case, which presents several important questions in the administration of the Durham 1 rule and the defense of insanity in District of Columbia criminal prosecutions, 2 is before the Court in the form of an alternative motion by the defendant, Calvin T. Amburgey, for judgment of acquittal by reason of insanity, 3 or for a new trial. 4 At the conclusion of the trial, the Court, which heard the case without a jury, found the defendant guilty of forging and uttering four checks, 5 and rejected the defense of insanity.
Before discussing the legal issues posed by this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Roosevelt Rollerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. William BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United States v. William BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972