Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Leyendecker

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 2005No. CA 04-427PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Marvin Cobb appeals from a judgment in favor of Charles Leyendecker in a breach of contract dispute. He argues that Leyendecker’s contract action was barred by both the statute of frauds and the statute of limitations. We hold that Cobb’s partial performance takes the contract out of the statute of frauds; however, we hold that the applicable statute of limitations bars Leyendecker from recovering for the full amount on his claim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On January 28, 2002, Leyendecker filed a complaint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Intl. Union v. Earle Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Crooked Creek, III, Inc. v. City of GreenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. F & M Building Partnership v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tadlock v. MoncusCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Dunn v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Coleman Consulting, LLC v. Domtar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  4. Cobb v. LeyendeckerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Jasper Wiseley v. Warren CoinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API