Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Leyendecker

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 2005No. CA 04-427Published

1Opinion of the Court

200 S.W.3d 924 (2005)

Marvin COBB, Appellant

v.

Charles LEYENDECKER, Appellee.

No. CA 04-427.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions III, IV.

January 12, 2005.

Meeks Law Firm, by: Roy E. Meeks, Pocahontas, for appellant.

Scott Manatt, Corning, for appellee.

WENDELL L. GRIFFEN, Judge.

Marvin Cobb appeals from a judgment in favor of Charles Leyendecker in a breach of contract dispute. He argues that Leyendecker's contract action was barred by both the statute of frauds and the statute of limitations. We hold that Cobb's partial performance takes the contract out of the statute of frauds; however, we…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nucor Holding Corp. v. RinkinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Ozarks Unlimited Resources Cooperative, Inc. v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Intl. Union v. Earle Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API