Legal Opinion

Moffitt v. Jordan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1900No. S.F. No. 1344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover an assessment, amounting with costs to fifty-two dollars and ninety- nine cents, made for street improvements, upon a lot owned by appellant, and to have it adjudged a lien against the lot. The court below filed findings, and judgment wds thereupon entered in favor of respondent. This appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. The law in regard to assessments for street improvements requires that there shall be a warrant signed by the superintendent of streets and the mayor of the city, authorizing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Gillis v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of San Francisco v. Certain Real EstateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Talbot v. WakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API