Legal Opinion
Surprise v. GTE Service Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 28, 2000No. 3:98CV255 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are plaintiff Ginsberg’s Motion for Protective Order [Doc. #47], plaintiff Ginsberg’s Motion to Dismiss Age Discrimination Claim [Doc. # 50] and plaintiff Ginsberg’s Motion to Remand [Doc. # 51].
I. Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 50]
Plaintiff Ginsberg moves under Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) to dismiss Count 4 of his complaint, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim, with prejudice and without costs to any party. Defendant GTE Service Corporation does not oppose the dismissal of Count 4, but claims that it is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Wilbert J. Sheets, Cross-Appellant v. Yamaha Motors Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Co. Ltd. Of Iwata, Japan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Dan Cantrell and Larry Holt v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 2021Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beer v. John Hancock Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- State v. Lead Industries Assoc., Inc.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Tessema v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021