Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cummins v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 4, 1995No. 1 CA-UB 94-0027Published

1DissentEhrlich, Judge

I respectfully dissent. While there frequently is a temptation to make an exception to, or stretch the meaning of a rule when the infraction is small and without manifest guile, it is not the province of this court to so act. In this case, the record is uncontradicted that the petitioner knew that the last day she had to mail her request for review was August 16, 1994. Indeed, she placed the envelope containing the filing, correctly stamped and addressed, into a Yuma Post Office receptacle on that date. However, she placed the envelope in the mail slot at the post office at 8:00 p.m., a full…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Capitol Castings, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Northland Pioneer College v. ZarcoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API