Legal Opinion

Roginski v. Time Warner Interactive, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 1997No. 3:CV-96-0182Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul A. Roginski (Roginski) filed this copyright infringement action against defendants Time Warner Interactive, Inc., Atari Games Corp. and Sega of America, Inc., alleging that defendants copied Roginski’s unpublished manuscript entitled “Awesome Possum” when the defendants created a video game and accompanying comic book — “Awesome Possum Kicks Dr. Machino’s Butt.” (Dkt. Entry 1.) The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming, inter alia, that their products were independently created and that there was no evidence that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Lipton v. Nature Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API