Legal Opinion

State v. McQuiston

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1996No. 95-216PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erdmann

Appellant Leslie McQuiston appeals from the judgment and sentence entered by the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaverhead County, convicting him of sexual intercourse without consent and incest. We affirm.

The issues on appeal are as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in allowing testimony regarding other acts committed by McQuiston?

2. Do McQuiston’s convictions for sexual intercourse without consent and incest violate double jeopardy protections?

3. Did the District Court err in sentencing McQuiston?

FACTS

In February 1989, Heidi McQuiston (Heidi) was nineteen years old. She lived in a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State v. JustMontana Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Miller v. Eighteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ShultsMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. CarterMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. VeisMontana Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API