Legal Opinion
Zabivnik v. Hannen (In Re Hannen)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 17, 2008No. 19-60110PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH BAXTER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Creditor’s Complaint as Untimely Filed (the “Motion”) submitted by the Debtors and Defendants, Dale and Alice Hannen (“Debtors” or “Debtor-Defendants”), over the objection of the Creditor, Richard Zabivnik (“Creditor” or “Plaintiff’). Such relief is sought pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 4007. Fed. R. Bankr.P. 4007. This Court acquires jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334, 157 and General Order No. 84 of this District. Following a duly noticed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Edwin M. Maughan, Sr., Debtor. John P. Nardei v. Edwin M. Maughan, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re: John Franklin Copper, Debtor. Athena Chen Copper Estate of Sumiko Yamaoka v. John Franklin CopperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re C-L Cartage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gbaz, Inc. v. ConteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Geerling Masonry, Inc. v. Thomas E. BeckeringUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010