Legal Opinion

S.D.M. of America v. Centerra

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 10, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-2997Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S.D.M. OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-2997 (CRC) CENTERRA, A CONSTELLIS COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The main question in this case is whether an employer’s rejection of a union grievance on timeliness grounds is a procedural issue to be decided by an arbitrator or a substantive matter to be decided by the Court. Finding the timeliness of the grievance to be procedural in nature, the Court will grant summary judgment for the union on its complaint to compel arbitration. I. Background The following background is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. BG Group, PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API