Legal Opinion

Fleitas v. Cockrem

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 29, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ebbor to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. The facts are stated in the Opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

delivered the-opinion of the court.

This is an action on a promissory note for $5,000 and interest thereon at five per cent per annum from maturity, Dec. 21, 1871. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs with privilege upon property which was attached in the course of the proceeding, with recourse on the principal and sureties on the bond upon which the property attached was released. The defen dáiit brougjht this writ of error.

It is assigned for error, first, that the issue on one of the exceptions (lis pendens) was tried by the court and not by a jury, no agreement to waive a trial by jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weeks v. FlowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
  2. Godeau v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  3. Williams v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griffith v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Bluegrass Canning Co. v. StewardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Loewe v. Union Savings Bank of DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
  4. Commonwealth v. LitchfieldDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API