Legal Opinion

Schlosser v. Clackamas Water District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1982No. 81-2-20, CA A23419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is an action for breach of contract. At the close of plaintiffs case in chief, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment and contends that there was sufficient evidence to present a jury question whether defendant had made an offer to sell real property that was accepted by plaintiff, resulting in a contract. We affirm.

The scope of our review in determining the propriety of a directed verdict is that

“we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southworth v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Foster v. Schnell Refrigeration Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Courteen Seed Co. v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Van Den Bron v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Central Coast Electric, Inc. v. MendellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Gerke v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Leggett v. First Interstate Bank of Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Torres v. Pacific Power and LightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API