Legal Opinion

Courteen Seed Co. v. Abraham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant assigns error of the court in overruling his motion for nonsuit in and by which he asserts that the evidence fails to show that defendant ever made a binding offer to plaintiff to sell clover seed.

Contracts in general are reached by an offer on the one side and acceptance on the other: 1 Page on the Law of Contracts, § 74. So it becomes necessary to determine whether the defendant actually offered to sell the clover seed to the plaintiff corporation, and whether it was defendant’s intention that contractual relations should exist between them on plaintiff’s acceptance.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moulton v. KershawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Nebraska Seed Co. v. HarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gaines v. VandecarOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lachmund v. Lope SingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. LaFlameNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Portland Web Pressmen's Union Local No. 17 v. Oregonian Publishing Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  3. Southworth v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Klimek v. PerisichOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. KimballOregon Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API