Legal Opinion
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Finnegan
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Howard Miller, J.
It is ordered that the motion by defendant for summary *254judgment is granted, with costs and disbursements to defendant.
On April 24, 1991, defendant purchased a 1986 Lincoln town car from Tri-County Auto Group, Inc. for $8,093. The purchase agreement provided a "30 day interest free finance.” Defendant also executed two retail installment contracts — one with Key Bank and one with plaintiff — as security for the purchase. The contracts were not to be processed during the 30-day interest-free period. On May 15, 1991 defendant paid the entire balance due on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ford v. Unity HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Brewster v. . CarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Crane v. . GruenewaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Legal Aid Society of Northeastern New York, Inc. v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Melstein v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hidden Brook Air, Inc. v. Thabet Aviation International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Chemical Bank v. Affiliated Fm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Am-Haul Carting, Inc. v. Contractors Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999