Legal Opinion

In re Twenty Grand Offshore, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 8, 1970No. 70-591-CivPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FULTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Twenty Grand Offshore, Inc., as owner of the tug El Mulo Grande has instituted this cause seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability. The limitation complaint in compliance with Rule F(2) refers to prior claims made against plaintiff by West India Carriers, Inc., charterer of the Barge “Wisco Ranger”, for indemnity in respect to a pending salvage action and a suit by Hasam Realty against the Barge, Carriers, plaintiff, and plaintiff’s tug, for alleged damages to beach groins and loss of beach of the Diplomat Hotel. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. BentleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. The Pere Marquette 18District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1913
  3. The KlotawahDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Complaint & Petition of Triton Asset LeasingDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  2. Drenth v. All PotentialDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API