Legal Opinion
State v. Gomez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 2003No. 27,303PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} The State charged Defendant Charles Gomez by criminal complaint with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI), contrary to NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102 (1999, prior to 2003 amendment). On Defendant’s motion, the district court dismissed the complaint on the ground that it failed to establish probable cause to believe that Defendant had committed the charged crime. On appeal by the State, the Court of Appeals determined that the complaint established probable cause that Defendant had committed DWI. As a result, the Court of Appeals reversed the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Ruben Alfonso and Feli GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Gregory R. Hall, A/K/A Don CusickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. FoulenfontNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HugheyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LaPIETRANew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MonafoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. RegerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.