Jay Lindsay, D/B/A Mac Advertising Company v. The City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant, the City of San Antonio, appeals the district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction restraining the enforcement of a city ordinance that prohibits the future display or placement of portable signs. We reverse.
I
Plaintiffs, who are in the business of supplying, leasing, renting and selling portable signs 1 in San Antonio, Texas, brought suit to challenge the constitutionality of San Antonio City Ordinance 62652 (“the ordinance”), enacted on April 3, 1986. The ordinance amends article V of Chapter 28 of the City Code of San Antonio by adding the following…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- DVD Copy Control Ass'n, Inc. v. BunnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Herbert Darrell Hay v. George P. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Don's Porta Signs, Inc., West Coast Sign Co. Ltd., Signs by Design of Florida, Inc. v. City of ClearwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Dedra Estell Overton, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Texas Education Agency, Samantha Price v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- John Doe, Timothy Campbell, and Ferris J. Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.