Legal Opinion

City of Henderson v. Breckinridge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 3, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM HENDERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. [Cited, Brands v. Louisville, 111 Ky. 56, 23 Ky. L. 442, 63 S. W. 2.]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Pryor;

If the statements contained in the answer filed by the city to the petition in which the injunction was obtained are true, the injunction granted the appellees should have been dissolved. The four acre lot is surrounded on all sides but one, as averred in the answer, by principal streets, and on that side by a public alley; and not only so, but the ground adjoining has been divided into- town lots, and many of them built upon, leaving the appellees with their lot enjoying all the privileges and benefits arising from the municipal government. It is not necessary that this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
  2. Brands v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krumpelman v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. Brands v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Dumesnil v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API