Legal Opinion

City of Escondido v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1973No. L.A. 30061PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

In this case we are asked to decide whether, under applicable law as it existed in 1965, a general law city could regulate the placement of signs and billboards along freeways without the necessity of complying with the law governing the adoption of zoning ordinances.

City of Escondido (“City”), a general law city, asserts that Government Code section 38774 1 authorized cities to regulate the placement of such signs and billboards by the enactment of an ordinance adopted in the manner prescribed for the adoption of ordinances generally. 2 Defendants, an outdoor advertising…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API