Legal Opinion

Peltier v. Dahlke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for the plaintiff in a personal injury action.

The only error assigned that calls for discussion is the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit.

Defendants were the owners of the Roseland Hotel in Portland and for several years prior to the accident in which plaintiff was injured, she was employed by them as a clerk at the registration desk. On February 10, 1964, while working behind the desk she fell to the floor and sustained serious injuries, including a broken hip. Plaintiff claims that the cause of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Celorie v. Roberts Bros., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. O'NEAL v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bingenheimer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Peltier v. DahlkeOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bingenheimer v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API