Legal Opinion

Spindel v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seymour Bieber, Spec. Ref. to Hear and Determine.

Petitioner seeks an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, directing respondents to recognize that he has been permanently promoted to the position of foreman of caretakers in the New York City Housing Authority. After a finding at Special Term that issues of fact were raised by the affidavits “as to whether petitioner qualified for permanent promotion in March, 1959, and as to the exact nature of the promotion he did receive at that time ’ % upon consent of counsel for the respective parties, this matter was referred to me,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Koso v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Matter of Berger v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Matter of Williams v. MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Brown v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. GarnseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Sanders v. KramarskyNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mazzeo v. Incorporated Village of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API