Legal Opinion

Kay v. Flying Goose, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1994PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), entered August 25, 1992, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

It is well settled that "a party in possession or control of real property may be held liable for a hazardous condition created on its premises as the result of the accumulation of snow or ice during a storm only after the lapse of a reasonable time for taking protective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Valentine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Valentine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Newsome v. CservakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Glick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Arcuri v. VitoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Powell v. MLG Hillside Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Fuks v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Boskey v. Gazza Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Mangieri v. Prime Hospitality Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Wall v. Village of MineolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API