Coles v. Yorks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Washington county, Crosby, J., presiding, denying their motion to set aside the sale and subsequent proceedings in a foreclosure suit, and granting the motion of plaintiff (who had purchased at the sale) for an order directing the sheriff to put her in possession.
1Opinion of the CourtGtleillan, C. J.
This was an action to foreclose a mortgage on block 3, in Holcombe’s addition to Stillwater. August 30, 1884, a judgment was entered determining the amount due, and directing that the mortgaged property (less the homestead, to be determined as thereafter directed) should be sold by the sheriff. It directed that the defendants should, within three days after service of a copy of the judgment by the sheriff, furnish to him in writing, signed by them, a description by metes and bounds of a lot or parts of lots of that portion of the said premises which they select as a homestead, which shall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McIver Lessee v. Walker and AnotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Lunt v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Jackson ex dem. Young & Devereux v. CampNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Vance v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Benedict v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. Chicago Lumber & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Sala v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Talbot v. BaragerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887