Noe v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal, by an indigent, is from a judgment of conviction by the Mobile Circuit Court for forgery in the first degree. The appellant, who has a Ph.D. in economics, pleaded guilty to the charge. Prior to accepting the plea, the court made the necessary inquiries as required by Boykin v. Alabama,395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. In addition, the record shows that State's Exhibit A, which is a motion to enter a guilty plea, reflects the Boykin requisites.
After the guilty plea was entered, the court ordered a pre-sentencing investigation, and sentencing was postponed. The appellant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Haywood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Vincent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Apicella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Kimberly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.