Legal Opinion

Vincent v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 13, 1992No. CR-90-458PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Mathew Vincent, was indicted for trafficking in marihuana and was convicted of the lesser offense of possession of marihuana. He was sentenced to a six-year split sentence, with nine months to serve in the penitentiary and five years to serve on probation. He was also fined $2500. He raises three issues on this appeal of that conviction.

I

Applying the four-part test set out in Barker v.Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192,33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), we hold that the appellant was not denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. The following chronology of events is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Chevere v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Sharifi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Vo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API